Call our quote line to speak to a qualified solicitor0800 987 8156* Send a message
*Call this mobile friendly number or your local branch
A man and women purchased a house in 1985 and took out a joint mortgage.
It was recenlty ruled by the Supreme Court that a man, who left his partner nearly 20 years ago and has not contributed to the mortgage for 13 years, is not entitled to half the value of the house they had shared.
The highest court in the UK decided that the man was instead entitled to 10% of its value and considered this unequal split “a fair one between the parties”.
The women was challenging a Court of Appeal ruling which had previously given the man an equal share of the home’s value. The Court of Appeal had decided that the man was still entitled to half the value of the house because the couple owned equal shares and since separation neither party had done anything to change the situation. It is this decison has now been overturned.
The decision puts a fresh light on the legal landscape for unmarried couples arguing over property after separating.
It is thought there are more than two million co-habiting couples in England and Wales.
Send us a message and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.Ask Us A Question
Cyber criminals are increasingly targeting victims by masquerading as law firms and financial institutions. Such activity is commonly known as phishing or spoofing. Click here for an example. If you are unsure as to the legitimacy of any unusual or suspicious emails received, please report to us on 0800 987 8156.